User talk:Antonio Vinzaretti: Difference between revisions

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Antonio Vinzaretti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=learn my contribution. I am just a learner, why block lol [[User:Antonio Vinzaretti|Antonio Vinzaretti]] ([[User talk:Antonio Vinzaretti#top|talk]]) 14:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=learn my contribution. I am just a learner, why block lol [[User:Antonio Vinzaretti|Antonio Vinzaretti]] ([[User talk:Antonio Vinzaretti#top|talk]]) 14:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=learn my contribution. I am just a learner, why block lol [[User:Antonio Vinzaretti|Antonio Vinzaretti]] ([[User talk:Antonio Vinzaretti#top|talk]]) 14:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi Antonio Vinzaretti! I noticed your contributions to Fidobank and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mykola Udianskyi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolai Udianskyi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Antonio. I have read your latest message on my talk page, in which you referred to the “rejection of result of [your] half-day work. I can in fact fully understand that it must be disheartening and annoying for a new editor who has put some work into finding out how to edit on Wikipedia, and creating a new article, only to see it thrown away, and I apologise for having been the instrument of that happening for you. However, we have to have standards for what is acceptable and what isn’t, or Wikipedia would be no different from FaceBook or an internet forum or blog, and those standards would be meaningless if we didn’t delete things which don’t comply with them. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won’t have the discouraging experience of…