Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump’s rhetoric: Difference between
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content added Content deleted
|
|
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
|
*:Such content would not remain in any article for long, per NPOV weight, NOTNEWS, etc. The same concern could be raised with respect to any article about a political campaign, a performing artist, et al. There is a substantial literature that presents expert and, increasingly, shcolarly summary and analysis of the themes and narratives of his public speech.[[User:SPECIFICO | SPECIFICO]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ”talk”]] 01:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC) |
*:Such content would not remain in any article for long, per NPOV weight, NOTNEWS, etc. The same concern could be raised with respect to any article about a political campaign, a performing artist, et al. There is a substantial literature that presents expert and, increasingly, shcolarly summary and analysis of the themes and narratives of his public speech.[[User:SPECIFICO | SPECIFICO]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ”talk”]] 01:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
|
* *”Keep” Initially my position was that this topic was too poorly defined to merit an article, but upon doing some research, it turns out there are a fair number of scholarly works on this exact topic (i.e. Trump’s methods of persuasion and modes of communication) including a scholarly book by this very name : https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1rr6dh8. (We should likewise rename this page Rhetoric of Donald Trump, I think.) The extent of the literature leads me to think the topic is indeed notable and has drawn significant scholarly and media attention. This, however, is not the topic that was being proposed on [[Donald Trump’s Authoritarianism]], nor should an article on either of these topics be taken as an excuse to continue omitting discussion of the scholarly literature and extremely extensive media coverage of Trump’s authoritarian inclinations or statements from the main article. That omission of one of the most widely written about aspects of the man continues to be scandalous.[[Special:Contributions/67.82.74.5|67.82.74.5]] ([[User talk:67.82.74.5|talk]]) 01:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC) |
* *”Keep” Initially my position was that this topic was too poorly defined to merit an article, but upon doing some research, it turns out there are a fair number of scholarly works on this exact topic (i.e. Trump’s methods of persuasion and modes of communication) including a scholarly book by this very name : https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1rr6dh8. (We should likewise rename this page Rhetoric of Donald Trump, I think.) The extent of the literature leads me to think the topic is indeed notable and has drawn significant scholarly and media attention. This, however, is not the topic that was being proposed on [[Donald Trump’s Authoritarianism]], nor should an article on either of these topics be taken as an excuse to continue omitting discussion of the scholarly literature and extremely extensive media coverage of Trump’s authoritarian inclinations or statements from the main article. That omission of one of the most widely written about aspects of the man continues to be scandalous.[[Special:Contributions/67.82.74.5|67.82.74.5]] ([[User talk:67.82.74.5|talk]]) 01:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 01:27, 16 December 2023
Donald Trump’s rhetoric[edit]
- Donald Trump’s rhetoric (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · AP · TWL)
the scope of this article is undefined and could include anything the man has ever said about anything in his lifetime soibangla (talk) 03:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep – as brought up at the talkpages of Donald Trump & Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign, there’s plenty of sources to support this article’s existence. GoodDay (talk) 03:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Draftify: Definitely “not ready for prime time” in its current state, but has potential for expansion and refinement. I agree with the nominator that there needs to be a more defined focus. A renaming should be considered as well. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 03:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Read More: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump’s rhetoric: Difference between