Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaby Jallo: Difference between revisions

Gaby Jallo[edit]

Gaby Jallo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · AP · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football‘s list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep – clearly notable, weak and lazy nomination. Nearly 100 appearances in the Dutch professional leagues, plenty of sources out there such as this and this and this and this and this and this and this and this and this and this and this, all from a very quick Google search – scope for expansion via Dutch Wikipedia. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 21:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete Spam all the routine transfer/injury/suspension coverage you can find but Jallo still fails GNG. Dougal18 (talk) 12:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep. While transfer/injury/suspension coverage do not automatically confer notability, there is sufficient SIGCOV here in RS for the WP:GNG. Nom, please do not nominate footballers who have played so many professional games! gidonb (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • The number of professional games is not relevant. Where is the evidence of SIGCOV you are referring too? I have not seen any sources which satisfy WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 07:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your standards seem different from other Wikipedians. Please also make note of this. More AfDs is usually not better. gidonb (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How so? The standards are clear. Simione001 (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See also below. gidonb (talk) 10:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure what i’m supposed to be seeing… Simione001 (talk) 01:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep, passes GNG with significant coverage.–Ortizesp (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep It’s has been proven there are multiple online sources, although weak in nature, they do build a picture when combined. Govvy (talk) 08:44, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Really? I haven’t seen anyway. The picture is of poor quality. Simione001 (talk) 11:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

JoelleJay (talk) 02:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of independent WP:SIGCOV. There are no guidelines saying an…