- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

OHIO WEATHER

User talk:DoubleGrazing: Difference between revisions


Tag: Mentorship panel question

 

Line 127: Line 127:

สรรพสิ่งมีชีวิต หมายถึง

สรรพสิ่งมีชีวิต หมายถึง

ฅน หมายถึง –[[User:Mr.Jhoine|Mr.Jhoine]] ([[User talk:Mr.Jhoine|talk]]) 16:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

ฅน หมายถึง –[[User:Mr.Jhoine|Mr.Jhoine]] ([[User talk:Mr.Jhoine|talk]]) 16:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

== Question from [[User:Mr.Jhoine|Mr.Jhoine]] (16:10, 13 July 2023) ==

What is you name it to me and I will be able ? to take this communication in Google forms add-on for –[[User:Mr.Jhoine|Mr.Jhoine]] ([[User talk:Mr.Jhoine|talk]]) 16:10, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

  • Note: If you’re here to message me about a draft or article, I would much appreciate if you could please link to the piece in question, so I don’t have to go hunting for it. Ta.
  • Another note: If I declined your draft at AfC, and you came to ask me to review it again, please don’t (unless I expressly said you could). I feel it’s fairer to the other drafts awaiting review that yours goes back to the pool.

Thanks for he heads up on the copy & cleaning it up. I also rewrote it. ? Geraldine Aino (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding Draft:Stephen J. Lye, see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Zionzina. S0091 (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. I’m the author of the draft draft:Michael Briguglio. I added even more references. I really really think that you are making my life difficult with your declined reviews. I really really think that the draft is very similar to other approved biographies that have been approved not declined. Please note my strong opposition to your declinement. Alan347 (talk) 08:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Alan347: noted. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello DoubleGrazing,

the article on the Austrian Private Universities Conference has already been supplemented with well-founded, independent sources.
Hopefully, the article will meet Wikipedia’s relevance criteria and quality standards.

With best regards,
Izbeka07 Izbeka07 (talk) 12:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Submission of the above-listed draft was recently declined. Please I need some assistance in perfecting the work to make it suitable for submission. Thank you.

Abialic (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi @Abialic: did you read any of the decline notices and accompanying comments? Schools must demonstrate notability by meeting the WP:GNG standard, which requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. This draft currently cites no such sources.
You must also ensure that the contents area properly supported by referencing. As a bare minimum, each paragraph should have at least one citation to indicate which source has provided that information. Currently there are multiple paragraphs without a single citation.
I have also posted a message on your user talk page asking you to disclose whatever relationship you may have with this subject. Please do so now. Thank you. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello,

Thanks so much for reviewing the draft. I’ve made the changes for tone like you mentioned. For sources, I’ve includes secondary, in-depth review of the panel that are written by industry experts using the…



Read More: User talk:DoubleGrazing: Difference between revisions

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.